David Caruso‘s ex-assistant says she went to the mat for him — lying under oath — and then he failed to hold up his end of the bargain, and exposed her to various forms of sexual harassment … but Caruso says she’s the one going again on her phrase.
The ex-assistant, who’s suing as Jane Doe, says she agreed to make a false assertion defending Caruso towards a authorized risk from one other assistant. In change for mendacity to assist him … she claims Caruso provided to purchase her a $250ok home in Cuba, give her $200ok to begin her personal biz and get her sister an condominium.
Doe claims she bought nearly not one of the above … however did get Caruso’s penis on her shoulder. According to the go well with, the previous “CSI: Miami” star steadily made undesirable sexual contact — brushing his hand or crotch towards her butt, and on one event … “stood behind [her] while she was seated and rubbed his penis against her shoulder.”
While Doe, who says she’s Hispanic, by no means bought the home in Cuba, she accompanied him there on vacays she claims bought fairly creepy. In the go well with, she describes a December 2015 journey the place Caruso was having intercourse together with his GF in an adjoining room. She says he yelled out Doe’s title, whereas telling the GF to … “scream out loud that he was large like a burro.”
Doe claims the following day Caruso bragged in entrance of her about his sexual prowess whereas his GF mentioned, “No mas burro, no mas burro!!”
Caruso’s ex-assistant additionally claims he usually made racist feedback about Jews, blacks, Latinos and homosexual folks — together with saying his Guatemalan nannies had “brains the size of a walnut” and utilizing the n-word.
According to the go well with, all Doe bought was $14ok for an condominium and a leased automotive. She’s suing him for wrongful termination, breaching their deal and fraud.
Caruso’s legal professional, Michael Weinsten at Lavely & Singer, tells us … “My client vehemently denies the allegations of the complaint. This Jane Doe plaintiff gave sworn testimony in a prior matter that flatly contradicts what she is now alleging.”
Weinsten provides, “In order to pursue this case, she will have to commit perjury and that will not stand. We will vigorously defend this lawsuit and are considering all available options and remedies.”